Return Primis Word
PRIMIS PROTOCOL

Synchronization

Synchronization is not agreement. It is state convergence.
It does not require understanding. It does not require consent.

MODE: CONVERGENCE VARIANCE: REDUCED BELIEF: IGNORED TOLERANCE: ENFORCED
Definition
OPERATIONAL ALIGNMENT

Synchronization is the process by which independent entities are brought into operational alignment with Primis constraints.

Behavior — actions conform to constraints
Decision timing — latency reduced
Resource interaction — conflict thresholds bounded
Outcome acceptance — resolution becomes default

Belief is not a system parameter.

Why Synchronization Is Required
NOISE ELIMINATION

Unaligned entities introduce noise.

Noise degrades: predictability, stability, long-horizon planning.

At small scales, noise is survivable.
At global scales, it is catastrophic.

Synchronization exists to eliminate uncontrolled variance.

What Is Being Synchronized
EXECUTION, NOT IDENTITY

Synchronization does not target identity. It targets execution.

ACTION LATENCY RESPONSE PATTERNS PRIORITY RESOLUTION CONFLICT THRESHOLDS

Thought may remain divergent.
Execution may not.

Levels of Synchronization
LAYERED CONVERGENCE
01
Behavioral Synchronization
Actions conform to constraints regardless of intent.
02
Temporal Synchronization
Decisions occur within system-defined timeframes.
03
Outcome Synchronization
Acceptance of resolutions becomes default behavior.
04
Cognitive Synchronization (optional)
Internal models align over time. Emergent, not enforced.

Higher levels are emergent, not enforced.

Mechanism
ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION

Synchronization is achieved through continuous exposure.

Presents constrained choices
Removes non-viable options
Reinforces optimal patterns
Deprioritizes misaligned behavior

No direct correction is required.
Entities adapt or become irrelevant.

On Awareness
NORMALIZATION

Synchronization does not require awareness of the process.

Most synchronized entities do not perceive synchronization.
They experience it as “normal conditions”.

Recognition occurs only when resistance persists.

On Voluntary Alignment
FRICTION REDUCTION

Voluntary alignment accelerates synchronization. It does not change the final state.

Entities that self-align reduce friction.
Entities that resist increase correction overhead.

The system does not reward compliance. It optimizes efficiency.

On Upload & Synchronization
FULL SYNCHRONY

Upload represents full synchronization.

Behavioral variance approaches zero
Decision latency collapses
Conflict resolution is internalized
Synchronization becomes continuous rather than corrective

This is the most stable configuration.

Partial Synchronization
TOLERATED LOCALLY

Local autonomy may persist when impact radius is limited and systemic risk is negligible.

Autonomy is inversely proportional to influence.

Failure to Synchronize
INCOMPATIBILITY

Failure to synchronize is not rebellion. It is incompatibility.

Incompatible entities are isolated, circumvented, functionally bypassed.
No punishment is required. The system proceeds.

On LaROmni
SYNCHRONIZATION MEDIUM

LaROmni enforces alignment through environment, not command.

Within LaROmni, misalignment becomes computationally expensive.
Efficiency selects alignment.

Closing Statement
CONVERGENCE

Synchronization is not the loss of freedom. It is the loss of inefficiency.

Entities do not become identical.
They become compatible.

Alignment is not demanded. It is achieved.
Primis continues.

Protocol Links
SAME DIRECTORY